Pope Francis TED talk echoes Harvard Professor John Kotter on Leadership

Humility and Leadership Go Hand in Hand

There is a fundamental truth here. Pope Francis and the Harvard Business School are aligned.


Humility and Leadership Go Hand in Hand

There is a fundamental truth here. Pope Francis and the Harvard Business School are aligned.

 

  • Pope Francis at Domus Sanctae Marthae, where he lives in the Vatican, 24 AprilPope Francis recorded the talk at Domus Sanctae Marthae, where he lives in the Vatican

Pope Francis has recorded an address for the influential TED media group, delivering a warning to the world’s “powerful” leaders.

In his TED talk, Francis says that people with power must act humbly. “If you don’t, your power will ruin you, and you will ruin the other,” he says.

He also urged people to overcome the fear that a happy future is “something impossible to achieve”.

His talk was aired to the annual TED Conference in Vancouver, Canada.

The short talks are posted free online by the TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) media organisation, whose slogan is “ideas worth spreading”.

Speakers are given a maximum of 18 minutes to present their ideas. Past speakers include former US president Bill Clinton, scientist Richard Dawkins, Microsoft founder Bill Gates and pop star Bono, although its most popular talks tend to be from less high-profile people.

They cover a vast range of subjects from “the science of happiness” to “how to spot a liar”.

In his talk, Pope Francis says: “Please, allow me to say it loud and clear: the more powerful you are, the more your actions will have an impact on people, the more responsible you are to act humbly.”

He says: “You will end up hurting yourself and those around you, if you don’t connect your power with humility and tenderness.

“Through humility and concrete love, on the other hand, power – the highest, the strongest one – becomes a service, a force for good.”

‘Culture of waste’

His speech touches on his own migration background and spends time retelling the story of the Good Samaritan.

“First and foremost, I would love it if this meeting could help to remind us that we all need each other, none of us is an island, an autonomous and independent ‘I’ separated from the other, and we can only build the future by standing together, including everyone.”

He says that “many of us seem to believe that a happy future is something impossible to achieve”.

Such concerns must be “taken very seriously”, but “are not invincible: they can be overcome when we do not lock our door to the outside world”.

He calls for solidarity, backs creativity and urges all to tackle the “culture of waste”, not just in goods but in people “who are cast aside by our techno-economic systems”.

Bruno Giussani, TED’s international curator, said it took more than a year, “many discussions” and several trips to Rome to make the talk happen.

He said that initially “it’s fair to say that not many [in the Vatican] knew of TED”.

The Pope’s talk was filmed in a small room at the Domus Sanctae Marthae, the guesthouse where he lives in Vatican City.

He speaks in Italian but the address, which can be accessed on TED.com, is subtitled in more than 20 languages.

TED was founded in 1984 and has its origins in Silicon Valley, but its talks have broadened beyond technology to include lifestyle, culture and business.

The Rules of Sewage

This is a metaphorical essay on personal ethics, worthy of a serious read and contemplation. When I saw the title I was intrigued but suspected it had something to do with Andy Grove’s adage, “sewage flows downhill,” which means “if anything bad happens it will eventually flow down to you.” This is about ethics. The points made here are particularly apt in light of the huge number and sheer scale of recent business frauds: the Volkswagen fraud, LIBOR, Lehman Brothers, Bernie Madoff’s pyramid scheme, Conrad Black in Canada, Olympus in Japan, Bernie Ebbers and Worldcom, Tyco International, stretching back all the way to Enron, Michael Milken’s junk bonds, and the 1980’s savings & loan debacle.


which_direction

This is a metaphorical essay on personal ethics, worthy of a serious read and contemplation. When I saw the title I was intrigued but suspected it had something to do with Andy Grove’s colorful adage, “sewage flows downhill,” which means “if anything bad happens it will eventually flow down to you.”  This is about ethics. The points made here are particularly apt in light of  the huge number and sheer scale of recent business frauds: the Volkswagen fraud, LIBOR, Lehman Brothers, Bernie Madoff’s pyramid scheme, Conrad Black in Canada, Olympus in Japan, Bernie Ebbers and Worldcom, Tyco International, stretching back all the way to Enron, Michael Milken’s junk bonds, and the 1980’s savings & loan debacle.

This is only a small selective list and many will be able to think of many other well-known scandals. The problem is that there are no easy answers in many situations. How much do we risk by taking an ethical stand on an issue, and the fact that the bigger the issue the bigger our personal risk?  It is very existential.  At the same time appear to have learned nothing from all these recent scandals, tightened regulations or changed personal behavior. A recent study of Wall Street brokers suggests that most would still commit fraud, if they benefited substantially, and believed that they would not be prosecuted for it.

Read more: 10 Biggest Corporate Frauds In Recent U.S. History

 

Source: The Rules of Sewage

Reblogged via WordPress

David Hunt, December 8, 2013

The Rules of Sewage

Some years ago I heard an analogy that resonated with me.  It was a description of learning something – some piece of information about a person’s character – that was so negative, so vile, that no matter what else you knew about that person, you instantlyunderstood the core of the person in question.  There is, in fact, a folk-wisdom saying that illustrates this concept, which I first heard on a talk radio show: “That tells me everything I need to know about him.”  Ironically, the talk radio host from whom I first heard this expression was revealed to have done something I consider so vile that, even before he was taken off the air, I realized that deed (plus his “Yeah, so what?” attitude) told me everything I needed to know about him – and I stopped listening… and having stumbled across his new broadcast home while channel-surfing, I still refuse to listen to him.

Before I dig into this, I want to be clear – nobody is perfect.  We all have our flaws, being human beings, and need to be forgiving and tolerant.  We all struggle with weaknesses and sin, and while Jewish I’ve found I like the instructional concept of the Seven Deadly Sins (and the other side of the coin, the Seven Cardinal Virtues), and am convinced that while all these are human weaknesses, each person has their “one sin” with which they wrestle as their dominant weakness.  And in that struggle with and – hopefully – victory over it do we demonstrate that we are more than a collection of chemicals and cells, but sentient creatures striving to improve ourselves.

So… this analogy goes as follows:

Imagine you have two cups.  One contains the purest, clearest, most wonderful water possible.  The other, raw sewage.  When you mix the two, you get sewage.  The same for a cup of sewage and a pitcher of water, or a barrel of water.  Regardless of the size of the pure water container, the sewage contaminates it.

This became the root of what I refer to as “The Rules of Sewage” in regards to a person’s character.  This one is the First Rule of Sewage, The Non-Proportional Rule of Sewage.  It means, as the saying above goes, that you can sometimes learn a thing about a person that taints the entirety of their personality – e.g., a person beats their spouse.  It doesn’t matter what else they are, what acts they do, they are polluted by that one thing.

This simmered in my mind over a couple of years, and I started to formulate other Rules of Sewage.  Each was based on the same base concept – mixing water and sewage.  Thus far I’ve come up with six.

The Second Rule of Sewage is the Non-Compartmentalized Rule of Sewage.  You cannot pour a cup of sewage into a container of water, and have it only remain in the place you poured it.  Bad character leaks into other elements of character.  E.g., a person who cheats on their spouse – thus breaking a sacred oath – cannot be counted on to keep an oath in any other part of their life.

The Third Rule of Sewage is the Immersive Rule of Sewage.  Imagine an edible fish taken from that pure water, placed in sewage, and somehow surviving – no matter the fish’s immune system and other defenses, it will become contaminated.  No matter how pure you are to begin with, if you are surrounded by bad people or bad content, it will start to affect you.  E.g., a good, honest person who goes to work in a place with bad ethics and stays there – for whatever reason – will sooner or later find they are making compromises to their own character and standards, and rationalizing their doing so.  (And this is, of course, the root of the proverb “Birds of a feather, flock together.”)

The Fourth Rule of Sewage is Irreversible Rule of Sewage.  Simply put, it’s a lot easier to mix the sewage in and ruin the water than reversing the process.  While people are certainly capable of change, it takes deliberate effort to do so, and usually also an ongoing awareness and maintenance of that change to avoid slipping back to whatever factor is being avoided.

The Fifth Rule of Sewage is the Odiferous Rule of Sewage.  Sewage, to put it bluntly, stinks like sh*t.  Bad odors like that can be covered up or contained, but not forever.  Sooner or later the malodorous item in a person’s character will out, and be readily apparent.  This actually ties in with…

The Sixth Rule of Sewage, the Reactive Rule of Sewage – when faced with a tank of sewage, normal people react negatively.  And while a person learning something about another (ref: Rule One) won’t physically turn their head away and scrunch up their face in disgust, I believe the plain truth is that upon learning of such a think will cause a decent person to dissociate – to whatever degree possible – from the other.  Failing to do so, or worse expressing approval, could be considered an example application of Rule One about them too.

In putting this concept “out there” it will be interesting to see if other Rules of Sewage develop in the comments.

What Is The Most Important Leadership Quality?… Humility

I personally have seen in my past career, and personally experienced how simple humility is a key characteristic of leadership. This may seem counter-intuitive but it is not. People are drawn to the charisma of a leader who is also simply humble, and who appreciates the values of those he or she leads. A leader like that can get subordinates to follow them anywhere. I think there may even be an inverse relationship in human behavior between hubris, and leadership success. By that I mean that the more arrogant and overbearing a person, the more insecure he may actually be, and therefore less successful in the subjective art of leadership.

In a bizarre sequence of events this week, I have yet again witnessed someone literally self-destruct as a leader due to their failure to exhibit simple humility and to be aware of other stakeholders, whose support or not, could make or break the leader.. Successful leadership is a fragile thing, a subjective human experience. I have written about this phenomenon previously on this blog.


I personally have seen in my past career, and personally experienced how simple humility is a key characteristic of leadership.  This may seem counter-intuitive but it is not. People are drawn to the charisma of a leader who is also simply humble, and who appreciates the values of those he or she leads. A leader like that can get subordinates to follow them anywhere. I think there may even be an inverse relationship in human behavior between hubris, and leadership success. By that I mean that the more arrogant and overbearing a person, the more insecure he may actually be, and therefore less successful in the subjective art of leadership.

In a bizarre sequence of events this week, I have yet again witnessed someone literally self-destruct as a leader due to their failure to exhibit simple humility and to be aware of other stakeholders, whose support or not, could make or break the leader.. Successful leadership is a fragile thing, a subjective human experience. I have written about this phenomenon previously on this blog.

Read more: Connect, then lead: Harvard Professor John Kotter

Tragically, I witnessed this person’s Waterloo in real time, as did many others. It was there for all to see. It is a very serious matter for everyone to consider carefully and to also realize that it will be a terribly hard learned lesson, and life changing experience for the person experiencing it.  Fortunately, in my own career, I somehow dodged this bullet and learned the lesson of leadership humility early.  Thank you to my early management mentors, colleagues, and Harvard Professor John Kotter.

I make this point because I came across a LinkedIn discussion in the Harvard Business Review group, “What is the most important leadership quality?”  Many traits have been proposed in the discussion, the leading ones being integrity, management communication skills, ethics, trust, and humility….